[Is there a place for granulocytes transfusions in 2023 ?] / Y a-t-il une place pour les transfusions de granulocytes en 2023 ?

Despite modern antimicrobial treatments, bacterial and fungal infections remain major complications in neutropenic patients. Granulocyte transfusions appeared in the 1950s-60s but first clinical trials were limited by the difficulty of transfusing enough viable granulocytes. The refinement of apheresis techniques as well as donor pretreatment with corticosteroids and/or granulocyte colony-stimulating growth factor (G-CSF) have led to improved collection yield. Despite this, uncertainties remain regarding the real clinical usefulness of granulocyte transfusions. Few studies have been carried out since the G-CSF era and the quality of scientific evidence remains low, mainly because of small case series. The largest prospective randomized controlled study published so far failed to demonstrate any benefit of therapeutic granulocyte transfusions on mortality or infection control. However, the quality of this trial is limited due to its low statistical power (insufficient patient recruitment). Moreover, granulocyte transfusions are complex procedures, burdensome for the donor, expensive and associated with a significant risk of adverse effects. Therefore, the current place of granulocyte transfusion in clinical practice is guided by the experience of each center. With the increasing emergence of multi-resistant germs, it is likely that granulocyte transfusion will become interesting in the coming years. Standardization of collection and administration procedures and the final proof of their (in)effectiveness will remain the challenges for the future.

En dépit des traitements antimicrobiens modernes, les infections bactériennes et fongiques restent des complications majeures chez les patients neutropéniques. Les transfusions de granulocytes (TG) sont apparues dans les années 1950-1960, mais les premiers essais cliniques ont été limités par la difficulté de transfuser un nombre suffisant de granulocytes viables. Le perfectionnement des techniques d'aphérèse ainsi que la stimulation pharmacologique du donneur par corticostéroïdes et/ou facteur de croissance granulocytaire (G-CSF) ont permis d'améliorer le rendement des collectes. Malgré cela, des incertitudes subsistent quant à la réelle utilité clinique des TG. Peu d'études ont été réalisées depuis l'ère du G-CSF et la qualité des preuves scientifiques reste faible. La plus large étude prospective contrôlée randomisée publiée à ce jour n'a pas pu démontrer de bénéfice des TG sur la mortalité ou le contrôle des infections. Cependant, la valeur de cet essai est limitée en raison de sa faible puissance statistique (recrutement de patients insuffisant). De plus, les TG sont des procédures complexes, lourdes pour le donneur, coûteuses et associées à un risque non négligeable d'effets indésirables. Par conséquent, la place actuelle des TG dans la pratique clinique est principalement guidée par l'expérience de chaque centre. Avec l'émergence croissante de germes multirésistants, il est probable que les TG suscitent à nouveau l'intérêt dans les années à venir. Les défis seront de parvenir à une détermination définitive de leur (in)efficacité et d'uniformiser les procédures de collecte et d'administration.

Improvement of untargeted proteomics workflow for surfaceome profiling and its evaluation through the implementation of quality controls: Application to multiple myeloma.

BACKGROUND: Comprehensive surfaceome profiling of cancer cells using mass spectrometry (MS)-based technologies is a valuable approach to identify new antigens that could be targeted by immunotherapies. Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable hematological malignancy in which patients suffer from multiple relapses associated with drug resistance. Nevertheless, only three MM-specific antigens are currently targeted by approved immunotherapies which restrain the availability of efficient treatments for severe refractory patients affected by aggressive forms of the disease. Therefore, the discovery of new antigens in this context could open new perspectives for those patients. RESULTS: In this study, the first objective was to improve a MS-based untargeted proteomics workflow in order to handle limited patient samples. For this purpose, a highly sensitive and robust miniaturized separation system (LC-Chip) coupled with drift tube ion mobility spectrometry and high-resolution MS was integrated in our workflow to maximize protein identification. As sample preparation can strongly influence the detectability of membrane-associated proteins, the critical steps in sample preparation were carefully optimized. As a result, 4.5 times more membrane-associated proteins were identified and experimental throughput was also drastically improved. In addition to workflow performance, particular attention was paid to assess the quality of the generated data. Indeed, several quality controls (QC) were implemented to assess data quality. Finally, the optimized workflow as well as selected QCs were evaluated in the analysis of samples containing limited number of cells. SIGNIFICANCE: This work allowed the improvement of an untargeted proteomics workflow for surfaceome profiling in terms of performance. Besides, the reliability of the obtained data was evaluated through the introduction of QCs in the workflow. The applicability of the improved workflow as well as the implemented QCs for the analysis of MM primary cells obtained from patients was confirmed.

Treatment of primary plasma cell leukaemia with carfilzomib and lenalidomide-based therapy (EMN12/HOVON-129): final analysis of a non-randomised, multicentre, phase 2 study.

BACKGROUND: Primary plasma cell leukaemia is a rare and aggressive plasma cell disorder with a poor prognosis. The aim of the EMN12/HOVON-129 study was to improve the outcomes of patients with primary plasma cell leukaemia by incorporating carfilzomib and lenalidomide in induction, consolidation, and maintenance therapy. METHODS: The EMN12/HOVON-129 study is a non-randomised, phase 2, multicentre study conducted at 19 academic centres and hospitals in seven European countries (Belgium, Czech Republic, Denmark, Italy, Norway, The Netherlands, and the UK) for previously untreated patients with primary plasma cell leukaemia aged 18 years or older. Inclusion criteria were newly diagnosed primary plasma cell leukaemia (defined as >2 ×109 cells per L circulating monoclonal plasma cells or plasmacytosis >20% of the differential white cell count) and WHO performance status 0-3. Patients aged 18-65 years (younger patients) and 66 years or older (older patients) were treated in age-specific cohorts and were analysed separately. Younger patients were treated with four 28-day cycles of carfilzomib (36 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 16), lenalidomide (25 mg orally on days 1-21), and dexamethasone (20 mg orally on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16, 22, and 23). Carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (KRd) induction was followed by double autologous haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT), four cycles of KRd consolidation, and then maintenance with carfilzomib (27 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1, 2, 15, and 16 for the first 12 28-day cycles, and then 56 mg/m2 on days 1 and 15 in all subsequent cycles) and lenalidomide (10 mg orally on days 1-21) until progression. Patients who were eligible for allogeneic HSCT, could also receive a single autologous HSCT followed by reduced-intensity conditioning allogeneic HSCT and then carfilzomib-lenalidomide maintenance. Older patients received eight cycles of KRd induction followed by maintenance therapy with carfilzomib and lenalidomide until progression. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. The primary analysis population was the intention-to-treat population, irrespective of the actual treatment received. Data from all participants who received any study drug were included in the safety analyses. The trial was registered at www.trialregister.nl (until June 2022) and https://trialsearch.who.int/ as NTR5350; recruitment is complete and this is the final analysis. FINDINGS: Between Oct 23, 2015, and Aug 5, 2021, 61 patients were enrolled and received KRd induction treatment (36 patients aged 18-65 years [20 (56%) were male and 16 (44%) female], and 25 aged ≥66 years [12 (48%) were male and 13 (52%) female]). With a median follow-up of 43·5 months (IQR 27·7-67·8), the median progression-free survival was 15·5 months (95% CI 9·4-38·4) for younger patients. For older patients, median follow-up was 32·0 months (IQR 24·7-34·6), and median progression-free survival was 13·8 months (95% CI 9·2-35·5). Adverse events were most frequently observed directly after treatment initiation, with infections (two of 36 (6%) younger patients and eight of 25 (32%) older patients) and respiratory events (two of 36 [6%] younger patients and four of 25 [16%] older patients) being the most common grade 3 or greater events during the first four KRd cycles. Treatment-related serious adverse events were reported in 26 (72%) of 36 younger patients and in 19 (76%) of 25 older patients, with infections being the most common. Treatment-related deaths were reported in none of the younger patients and three (12%) of the older patients (two infections and one unknown cause of death). INTERPRETATION: Carfilzomib and lenalidomide-based therapy provides improved progression-free survival compared with previously published data. However, results remain inferior in primary plasma cell leukaemia compared with multiple myeloma, highlighting the need for new studies incorporating novel immunotherapies. FUNDING: Dutch Cancer Society, Celgene (a BMS company), and AMGEN.

Plain language summary of the MonumenTAL-1 study of talquetamab in people with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.

WHAT IS THIS SUMMARY ABOUT?: This plain language summary describes the results of a phase 1 research study (or clinical trial) called MonumenTAL-1 published in the New England Journal of Medicine in December 2022. A phase 1 study is an early clinical trial where researchers evaluate how safe a medicine is at different doses in a small number of people. In the MonumenTAL-1 study, researchers looked at a new medicine under development called talquetamab, for people living with multiple myeloma (a type of blood cancer) who did not respond (refractory), stopped responding (relapsed), or who had difficulty dealing with their previous treatments. HOW WAS THE STUDY CONDUCTED?: The phase 1 MonumenTAL-1 study was performed in 2 parts. Safety was the main focus of Part 1 in which side effects, and how serious they were, were assessed. The results of Part 1 were used to identify doses of talquetamab that were well tolerated, without a need to stop treatment or reduce the doses, for further study in Part 2. Part 2 of the study examined how well talquetamab worked to decrease signs of the cancer and what side effects, and their severity, people experienced at the doses identified in Part 1. WHAT WERE THE RESULTS?: In Part 1 of the study, researchers identified 2 doses of talquetamab for further study: 405 micrograms for every kilogram of body weight (µg/kg) given weekly and 800 µg/kg every other week. All participants experienced at least one side effect of treatment at these 2 doses. Less than half of participants (43% at 405 µg/kg weekly dose and 34% at the 800 µg/kg every other week dose) experienced serious side effects which are those side effects that led to hospitalization, death, or permanent or life-threatening damage). The most common side effects at both doses were a condition known as cytokine release syndrome (CRS); changes in blood cell levels (where different types of cells in the blood were measured); changes in skin such as itching, dry skin, eczema, ulcers or shedding; changes in nails such as discoloration or ridging (lines or dents); and changes in sense of taste such as food tasting sour or metallic. CRS is caused by the overactivation of the immune system (the body's natural defense system) and can result in fever, feeling sick (nausea), being tired (fatigue), low blood pressure, low blood oxygen levels and body aches. Most cases of CRS, as well as most other side effects, were mild or moderate. Most common serious events were CRS, fever and bone pain. Most people had fewer signs of the cancer after taking talquetamab, and the response was similar between the 2 doses. The median duration of response at the 2 identified doses was 8-10 months. WHAT DO THE RESULTS MEAN?: Most of the side effects people experienced when taking talquetamab were mild or moderate. Most people who took talquetamab responded to the treatment even though they hadn't responded or stopped responding to previous multiple myeloma treatments or stopped taking those treatments because they were unable to tolerate them. These results demonstrate the potential of talquetamab as a treatment option in people who have used up other available therapy options. The 2 doses of talquetamab identified here are being examined in a larger group of participants to further test for safety and to test how well people respond.

Prevention and management of adverse events during treatment with bispecific antibodies and CAR T cells in multiple myeloma: a consensus report of the European Myeloma Network.

T-cell redirecting bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) and chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR T cells) have revolutionised multiple myeloma therapy, but adverse events such as cytokine release syndrome, immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), cytopenias, hypogammaglobulinaemia, and infections are common. This Policy Review presents a consensus from the European Myeloma Network on the prevention and management of these adverse events. Recommended measures include premedication, frequent assessing for symptoms and severity of cytokine release syndrome, step-up dosing for several BsAbs and some CAR T-cell therapies; corticosteroids; and tocilizumab in the case of cytokine release syndrome. Other anti-IL-6 drugs, high-dose corticosteroids, and anakinra might be considered in refractory cases. ICANS often arises concomitantly with cytokine release syndrome. Glucocorticosteroids in increasing doses are recommended if needed, as well as anakinra if the response is inadequate, and anticonvulsants if convulsions occur. Preventive measures against infections include antiviral and antibacterial drugs and administration of immunoglobulins. Treatment of infections and other complications is also addressed.

Integrative Analysis of Proteomics and Transcriptomics Reveals Endothelin Receptor B as Novel Single Target and Identifies New Combinatorial Targets for Multiple Myeloma.

Despite the recent introduction of next-generation immunotherapeutic agents, multiple myeloma (MM) remains incurable. New strategies targeting MM-specific antigens may result in a more effective therapy by preventing antigen escape, clonal evolution, and tumor resistance. In this work, we adapted an algorithm that integrates proteomic and transcriptomic results of myeloma cells to identify new antigens and possible antigen combinations. We performed cell surface proteomics on 6 myeloma cell lines based and combined these results with gene expression studies. Our algorithm identified 209 overexpressed surface proteins from which 23 proteins could be selected for combinatorial pairing. Flow cytometry analysis of 20 primary samples confirmed the expression of FCRL5, BCMA, and ICAM2 in all samples and IL6R, endothelin receptor B (ETB), and SLCO5A1 in >60% of myeloma cases. Analyzing possible combinations, we found 6 combinatorial pairs that can target myeloma cells and avoid toxicity on other organs. In addition, our studies identified ETB as a tumor-associated antigen that is overexpressed on myeloma cells. This antigen can be targeted with a new monoclonal antibody RB49 that recognizes an epitope located in a region that becomes highly accessible after activation of ETB by its ligand. In conclusion, our algorithm identified several candidate antigens that can be used for either single-antigen targeting approaches or for combinatorial targeting in new immunotherapeutic approaches in MM.

Real-world use of carfilzomib combined with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with multiple myeloma in Europe and Israel.

Clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of carfilzomib in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM); however, prospective real-world data are limited. This real-world, prospective, observational study evaluated carfilzomib use, effectiveness and safety in adults with RRMM. Data are presented for a subset of patients (n = 383) who received carfilzomib in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (KRd). The overall response rate (ORR) was 83.6% among 360 evaluable patients. Treatment responses were better when KRd was administered at earlier therapy lines than at later lines of therapy (ORR: second line, 85.3%; third line or later, 81.0%). In patients with the anti-CD38 antibody-refractory disease, ORR was higher when KRd was administered earlier than at later therapy lines (second line/third line, 75.0%; fourth line or later, 60.0%). An ORR of 68.1% and 82.0% was achieved in the lenalidomide-refractory and not lenalidomide-refractory subgroups, respectively. KRd was consistently administered per the European label (twice weekly dose of 27 mg/m2) and the median time to discontinuation was 14.6 months. The safety profile of KRd was consistent with previous studies. These real-world data highlight the effectiveness of KRd as a treatment for patients with RRMM, including those with disease refractory to lenalidomide or anti-CD38 antibodies.

Post-transplant cyclophosphamide prevents xenogeneic graft-versus-host disease while depleting proliferating regulatory T cells.

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) remains a serious limitation of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). While post-transplant administration of cyclophosphamide (PTCy) is increasingly used as GVHD prophylaxis, its precise mechanisms of action and its impact on graft-versus-leukemia effects have remained debated. Here, we studied the mechanisms of xenogeneic GVHD (xGVHD) prevention by PTCy in different humanized mouse models. We observed that PTCy attenuated xGVHD. Using flow cytometry and single-cell RNA-sequencing, we demonstrated that PTCy depleted proliferative CD8+ and conventional CD4+ T cells but also proliferative regulatory T cells (Treg). Further, T-cell receptor ß variable region sequencing (TCRVB) analyses demonstrated that highly xenoreactive T-cell clones were depleted by PTCy. Although Treg frequencies were significantly higher in PTCy-treated than in control mice on day 21, xGVHD attenuation by PTCy was not abrogated by Treg depletion. Finally, we observed that PTCy did not abrogate graft-versus-leukemia effects.

Talquetamab, a T-Cell-Redirecting GPRC5D Bispecific Antibody for Multiple Myeloma.

BACKGROUND: G protein-coupled receptor, family C, group 5, member D (GPRC5D) is an orphan receptor expressed in malignant plasma cells. Talquetamab, a bispecific antibody against CD3 and GPRC5D, redirects T cells to mediate killing of GPRC5D-expressing myeloma cells. METHODS: In a phase 1 study, we evaluated talquetamab administered intravenously weekly or every other week (in doses from 0.5 to 180 µg per kilogram of body weight) or subcutaneously weekly, every other week, or monthly (5 to 1600 µg per kilogram) in patients who had heavily pretreated relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma that had progressed with established therapies (a median of six previous lines of therapy) or who could not receive these therapies without unacceptable side effects. The primary end points - the frequency and type of dose-limiting toxic effects (study part 1 only), adverse events, and laboratory abnormalities - were assessed in order to select the recommended doses for a phase 2 study. RESULTS: At the data-cutoff date, 232 patients had received talquetamab (102 intravenously and 130 subcutaneously). At the two subcutaneous doses recommended for a phase 2 study (405 µg per kilogram weekly [30 patients] and 800 µg per kilogram every other week [44 patients]), common adverse events were cytokine release syndrome (in 77% and 80% of the patients, respectively), skin-related events (in 67% and 70%), and dysgeusia (in 63% and 57%); all but one cytokine release syndrome event were of grade 1 or 2. One dose-limiting toxic effect of grade 3 rash was reported in a patient who had received talquetamab at the 800-µg dose level. At median follow-ups of 11.7 months (in patients who had received talquetamab at the 405-µg dose level) and 4.2 months (in those who had received it at the 800-µg dose level), the percentages of patients with a response were 70% (95% confidence interval [CI], 51 to 85) and 64% (95% CI, 48 to 78), respectively. The median duration of response was 10.2 months and 7.8 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Cytokine release syndrome, skin-related events, and dysgeusia were common with talquetamab treatment but were primarily low-grade. Talquetamab induced a substantial response among patients with heavily pretreated relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. (Funded by Janssen Research and Development; MonumenTAL-1 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03399799.).

Real-World Use and Effectiveness of Carfilzomib Plus Dexamethasone in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma in Europe.

This prospective, observational study examined the real-world use of carfilzomib across 11 European countries in adults with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) who received at least one prior line of therapy. Carfilzomib and dexamethasone (Kd) use, effectiveness and safety were analyzed. In total, 271 patients received Kd among 701 adults enrolled. The median relative dose intensity of carfilzomib was 82.7% (20/56 mg/m2, twice weekly). The overall response rate (ORR) to Kd was 68.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 62.7-74.5): 79.2% in second line (2L), 71.6% in third line (3L) and 63.1% in fourth line or later (4L+). The ORR was 59.9% (95% CI, 51.1-68.1) in the lenalidomide-refractory subgroup and 67.7% (95% CI, 48.6-83.3) in the not lenalidomide-refractory subgroup. In the anti-CD38 refractory subgroup, the ORR was 51.6% (95% CI, 38.6-64.5); ORRs were higher when Kd was received at 2L/3L (66.7%) than at 4L+ (49.1%). Overall, patients were treated for a median time of 7.7 months. One-fifth of patients reported treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events (≥grade 3), with a safety profile consistent with previous clinical trials. This study demonstrated the real-world use, effectiveness and safety of Kd in patients with RRMM. Despite the increasing number of new therapeutic strategies to treat RRMM, Kd remains a safe and effective option, even for older, frail and lenalidomide- or anti-CD38 mAb-refractory patients.

Contribution of Capillary Zone Electrophoresis Hyphenated with Drift Tube Ion Mobility Mass Spectrometry as a Complementary Tool to Microfluidic Reversed Phase Liquid Chromatography for Antigen Discovery.

The discovery of new antigens specific to multiple myeloma that could be targeted by novel immunotherapeutic approaches is currently of great interest. To this end, it is important to increase the number of proteins identified in the sample by combining different separation strategies. A capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE) method, coupled with drift tube ion mobility (DTIMS) and quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (QTOF), was developed for antigen discovery using the human myeloma cell line LP-1. This method was first optimized to obtain a maximum number of identifications. Then, its performance in terms of uniqueness of identifications was compared to data acquired by a microfluidic reverse phase liquid chromatography (RPLC) method. The orthogonality of these two approaches and the physicochemical properties of the entities identified by CZE and RPLC were evaluated. In addition, the contribution of DTIMS to CZE was investigated in terms of orthogonality as well as the ability to provide unique information. In conclusion, we believe that the combination of CZE-DTIMS-QTOF and microfluidic RPLC provides unique information in the context of antigen discovery.

Radiotheranostic Agents in Hematological Malignancies.

Radioimmunotherapy (RIT) is a cancer treatment that combines radiation therapy with tumor-directed monoclonal antibodies (Abs). Although RIT had been introduced for the treatment of CD20 positive non-Hodgkin lymphoma decades ago, it never found a broad clinical application. In recent years, researchers have developed theranostic agents based on Ab fragments or small Ab mimetics such as peptides, affibodies or single-chain Abs with improved tumor-targeting capacities. Theranostics combine diagnostic and therapeutic capabilities into a single pharmaceutical agent; this dual application can be easily achieved after conjugation to radionuclides. The past decade has seen a trend to increased specificity, fastened pharmacokinetics, and personalized medicine. In this review, we discuss the different strategies introduced for the noninvasive detection and treatment of hematological malignancies by radiopharmaceuticals. We also discuss the future applications of these radiotheranostic agents.

Patient selection for CAR T or BiTE therapy in multiple myeloma: Which treatment for each patient?

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a plasma cell malignancy that affects an increasing number of patients worldwide. Despite all the efforts to understand its pathogenesis and develop new treatment modalities, MM remains an incurable disease. Novel immunotherapies, such as CAR T cell therapy (CAR) and bispecific T cell engagers (BiTE), are intensively targeting different surface antigens, such as BMCA, SLAMF7 (CS1), GPRC5D, FCRH5 or CD38. However, stem cell transplantation is still indispensable in transplant-eligible patients. Studies suggest that the early use of immunotherapy may improve outcomes significantly. In this review, we summarize the currently available clinical literature on CAR and BiTE in MM. Furthermore, we will compare these two T cell-based immunotherapies and discuss potential therapeutic approaches to promote development of new clinical trials, using T cell-based immunotherapies, even as bridging therapies to a transplant.

Bortezomib and high-dose melphalan conditioning regimen in frontline multiple myeloma: an IFM randomized phase 3 study.

High-dose melphalan (HDM) and transplantation are recommended for eligible patients with multiple myeloma. No other conditioning regimen has proven to be more effective and/or safer. We previously reported in a phase 2 study that bortezomib can safely and effectively be combined with HDM (Bor-HDM), with a 32% complete response (CR) rate after transplantation. These data supported a randomized phase 3 trial. Randomization was stratified according to risk and response to induction: 300 patients were enrolled, and 154 were allocated to the experimental arm (ie, arm A) with bortezomib (1 mg/m2 intravenously [IV]) on days -6, -3, +1, and +4 and melphalan (200 mg/m2 IV) on day -2. The control arm (ie, arm B) consisted of HDM alone (200 mg/m2 IV). There were no differences in stringent CR + CR rates at day 60 posttransplant (primary end point): 22.1% in arm A vs 20.5% in arm B (P = .844). There were also no differences in undetectable minimum residual disease rates: 41.3% vs 39.4% (P = .864). Median progression-free survival was 34.0 months for arm A vs 29.6 months for arm B (adjusted HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.61-1.13; P = .244). The estimated 3-year overall survival was 89.5% in both arms (hazard ratio, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.62-2.64; P = .374). Sixty-nine serious adverse events occurred in 18.7% of Bor-HDM-treated patients (vs 13.1% in HDM-treated patients). The proportion of grade 3/4 AEs was similar within the 2 groups (72.0% vs 73.1%), mainly (as expected) blood and gastrointestinal disorders; 4% of patients reported grade 3/4 or painful peripheral neuropathy in arm A (vs 1.5% in arm B). In this randomized phase 3 study, a conditioning regimen with Bor-HDM did not improve efficacy end points or outcomes compared with HDM alone. The original trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02197221.

Extramedullary disease in multiple myeloma: a systematic literature review.

Extramedullary involvement (or extramedullary disease, EMD) represents an aggressive form of multiple myeloma (MM), characterized by the ability of a clone and/or subclone to thrive and grow independent of the bone marrow microenvironment. Several different definitions of EMD have been used in the published literature. We advocate that true EMD is restricted to soft-tissue plasmacytomas that arise due to hematogenous spread and have no contact with bony structures. Typical sites of EMD vary according to the phase of MM. At diagnosis, EMD is typically found in skin and soft tissues; at relapse, typical sites involved include liver, kidneys, lymph nodes, central nervous system (CNS), breast, pleura, and pericardium. The reported incidence of EMD varies considerably, and differences in diagnostic approach between studies are likely to contribute to this variability. In patients with newly diagnosed MM, the reported incidence ranges from 0.5% to 4.8%, while in relapsed/refractory MM the reported incidence is 3.4 to 14%. Available data demonstrate that the prognosis is poor, and considerably worse than for MM without soft-tissue plasmacytomas. Among patients with plasmacytomas, those with EMD have poorer outcomes than those with paraskeletal involvement. CNS involvement is rare, but prognosis is even more dismal than for EMD in other locations, particularly if there is leptomeningeal involvement. Available data on treatment outcomes for EMD are derived almost entirely from retrospective studies. Some agents and combinations have shown a degree of efficacy but, as would be expected, this is less than in MM patients with no extramedullary involvement. The paucity of prospective studies makes it difficult to justify strong recommendations for any treatment approach. Prospective data from patients with clearly defined EMD are important for the optimal evaluation of treatment outcomes.

Recommendations on the management of multiple myeloma in 2020.

With the introduction of immunomodulatory drugs, proteasome inhibitors, and anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies, major improvements have been achieved in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM), with a significant impact on the outcome of this disease. Different treatment combinations are now in use and other therapies are being developed. Based on an extensive review of the recent literature, we propose practical recommendations on myeloma management, to be used by hematologists as a reference for daily practice.

Primary plasma cell leukemia: consensus definition by the International Myeloma Working Group according to peripheral blood plasma cell percentage.

Primary plasma cell leukemia (PCL) has a consistently ominous prognosis, even after progress in the last decades. PCL deserves a prompt identification to start the most effective treatment for this ultra-high-risk disease. The aim of this position paper is to revisit the diagnosis of PCL according to the presence of circulating plasma cells in patients otherwise meeting diagnostic criteria of multiple myeloma. We could identify two retrospective series where the question about what number of circulating plasma cells in peripheral blood should be used for defining PCL. The presence of ≥5% circulating plasma cells in patients with MM had a similar adverse prognostic impact as the previously defined PCL. Therefore, PCL should be defined by the presence of 5% or more circulating plasma cells in peripheral blood smears in patients otherwise diagnosed with symptomatic multiple myeloma.

A non-internalised CD38-binding radiolabelled single-domain antibody fragment to monitor and treat multiple myeloma.

BACKGROUND: Antibody-based therapies targeting CD38 are currently used as single agents as well as in combination regimens for multiple myeloma, a malignant plasma cell disorder. In this study, we aimed to develop anti-CD38 single-domain antibodies (sdAbs) that can be used to trace CD38+ tumour cells and subsequently used for targeted radionuclide therapy. SdAbs are derived from Camelidae heavy-chain antibodies and have emerged as promising theranostic agents due to their favourable pharmacological properties. METHODS: Four different anti-CD38 sdAbs were produced, and their binding affinities and potential competition with the monoclonal antibody daratumumab were tested using biolayer interferometry. Their binding kinetics and potential cell internalisation were further studied after radiolabelling with the diagnostic radioisotope Indium-111. The resulting radiotracers were evaluated in vivo for their tumour-targeting potential and biodistribution through single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT/CT) imaging and serial dissections. Finally, therapeutic efficacy of a lead anti-CD38 sdAb, radiolabelled with the therapeutic radioisotope Lutetium-177, was evaluated in a CD38+ MM xenograft model. RESULTS : We retained anti-CD38 sdAb #2F8 as lead based on its excellent affinity and superior stability, the absence of competition with daratumumab and the lack of receptor-mediated internalisation. When intravenously administered to tumour-xenografted mice, radiolabelled sdAb #2F8 revealed specific and sustained tumour retention with low accumulation in other tissues, except kidneys, resulting in high tumour-to-normal tissue ratios. In a therapeutic setting, myeloma-bearing mice received three consecutive intravenous administrations of a high (18.5 MBq) or a low radioactive dose (9.3 MBq) of 177Lu-DTPA-2F8 or an equal volume of vehicle solution. A dose-dependent tumour regression was observed, which translated into a prolonged median survival from 43 days for vehicle-treated mice, to 62 days (p = 0.027) in mice receiving the low and 65 days in mice receiving the high (p = 0.0007) radioactive dose regimen, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These results highlight the theranostic potential of radiolabelled anti-CD38 sdAbs for the monitoring and treatment of multiple myeloma.

COVID-19 vaccination in patients with multiple myeloma: a consensus of the European Myeloma Network.

Patients with multiple myeloma frequently present with substantial immune impairment and an increased risk for infections and infection-related mortality. The risk for infection with SARS-CoV-2 virus and resulting mortality is also increased, emphasising the importance of protecting patients by vaccination. Available data in patients with multiple myeloma suggest a suboptimal anti-SARS-CoV-2 immune response, meaning a proportion of patients are unprotected. Factors associated with poor response are uncontrolled disease, immunosuppression, concomitant therapy, more lines of therapy, and CD38 antibody-directed and B-cell maturation antigen-directed therapy. These facts suggest that monitoring the immune response to vaccination in patients with multiple myeloma might provide guidance for clinical management, such as administration of additional doses of the same or another vaccine, or even temporary treatment discontinuation, if possible. In those who do not exhibit a good response, prophylactic treatment with neutralising monoclonal antibody cocktails might be considered. In patients deficient of a SARS-CoV-2 immune response, adherence to measures for infection risk reduction is particularly recommended. This consensus was generated by members of the European Multiple Myeloma Network and some external experts. The panel members convened in virtual meetings and conducted an extensive literature research and evaluated recently published data and work presented at meetings, as well as findings from their own studies. The outcome of the discussions on establishing consensus recommendations for COVID-19 vaccination in patients with multiple myeloma was condensed into this Review.